Our current beneficial, warm Holocene interglacial has been the enabler of mankind’s civilisation for the last 10,000 years. The congenial climate of the Holocene epoch spans from mankind’s earliest farming to the scientific and technological advances of the last 100 years.
However all the Northern Hemisphere Ice Core records from Greenland show:
- the last millennium 1000AD – 2000AD has been the coldest millennium of the entire Holocene interglacial.
- each of the notable high points in the Holocene temperature record, (Holocene Climate Optimum – Minoan – Roman – Medieval – Modern), have been progressively colder than the previous high point.
- for its first 7-8000 years the early Holocene, including its high point “climate optimum”, had virtually flat temperatures, an average drop of only ~0.007 °C per millennium.
- but the more recent Holocene, since a “tipping point” at ~1000BC, has seen a temperature diminution at more than 20 times that earlier rate at about 0.14 °C per millennium.
- the Holocene interglacial is already 10 – 11,000 years old and judging from the length of previous interglacials the Holocene epoch should be drawing to its close: in this century, the next century or this millennium.
- the beneficial warming at the end of the 20th century to the Modern high point has been transmuted into the “Great Man-made Global Warming Scare”.
- eventually this late 20th century temperature blip will come to be seen as just noise in the system in the longer term progress of comparatively rapid cooling over the last 3000+ years.
- other published Greenland Ice Core records as well as GISP2, (NGRIP1, GRIP) corroborate this finding. They also exhibit the same pattern of a prolonged relatively stable early Holocene period followed by a subsequent much more rapid decline in the more recent past.
When considering the scale of temperature changes that alarmists anticipate because of Man-made Global Warming and their view of the disastrous effects of additional Man-made Carbon Dioxide emissions in this century, it is useful to look at climate change from a longer term, century by century and even on a millennial perspective.
The much vaunted and much feared “fatal” tipping point of +2°C would only bring Global temperatures close to the level of the very congenial climate of “the Roman warm period”.
If it were possible to reach the “horrendous” level of +4°C postulated by Warmists, that extreme level of warming would still only bring temperatures to about the level of the previous Eemian maximum, a warm and abundant epoch, when hippopotami thrived in the Rhine delta.
For a more comprehensive view of the decline of the Holocene see:
The Recent Geological Context
The Antarctic Vostok and EPICA ice core records, using the δ18Oxygen temperature assessment technique, show that
- there have been regular fluctuations at about 100,000 year intervals over the past 800,000 years
- there have been 5 probably warmer interglacial periods in the last 450,000 years
- interglacial periods have varied both in temperature intensity and duration.
On occasions some earlier interglacial periods were significantly shorter than the 10,000 year norm.
The Antarctic based EPICA and Vostok Ice Cores above mostly show good accord for the last 200,000 years. Earlier there seems to be a similar pattern but with some significant time displacement in the period between 200,000 and 450,000 years ago. Those two Antarctic records are not so well coordinated during the recent Holocene period.
This repeating pattern of long periods of glaciation, (~100,000 years), when much of the Northern hemisphere is covered by ices sheets several kilometres deep. These are followed by much shorter warmer inter-glacial periods, (~10,000 years), is driven by the orbital geometry of the earth around the sun. It can be modulated by the shorter term periodic behaviour of the sun. These facts controlling the earth’s climate are well documented and well understood.
Prior to the current Holocene epoch a period of deep, encroaching, glaciation had persisted for the previous 100,000+ years as shown by the four Greenland records.
Such long periods of glaciation meant that a mile high ice sheet covered New York as well as much of the currently inhabited Northern hemisphere.
Those glacial conditions can and will return.
On past experience, at about 11,000 years the Holocene interglacial must be approaching its reversion back to a long period of full glaciation.
That ~110,000 year long period of glaciation was preceded by the Eemian interglacial period. The Eemian epoch was at its warmest about 120,000 years ago. It was some +3°C warmer on average than the Holocene “Climate Optimum”, of just some ~8000 years ago.
The Eemian interglacial had a much higher peak but lasted about same length of time as the current Holocene. The current Holocene epoch has had significantly lower temperatures and has had a less exaggerated temperature peak than that of the Eemian interglacial.
The GRIP Greenland Ice Core record in the Northern Hemisphere also clearly shows the onset of the Holocene interglacial and the onset is well coordinated with the Vostok and EPICA Antarctic records.
So based on this pattern of radical climate change our current benign Holocene interglacial could well, our rather should be drawing towards its close.
The temperature profile of our Holocene Epoch
The Northern Hemisphere GISP2 Greenland Ice Core data gives this well accepted detailed profile of our current Holocene Epoch.
According to longer term Northern Hemisphere Greenland GRIP ice core records, the last millennium 1000 – 2000 AD has been the coldest millennium of the current Holocene epoch, with millennial average temperatures about 1.8°C lower than its early “Holocene climate optimum” in about 7-6000 BC.
There has since been a comparatively minor temperature recovery since the Little Ice Age some 2-300 years ago.
However, it is this limited recovery in temperature that has recently given rise to the “Great Global Warming Scare”.
The overall millennial difference during the Holocene since ~8000BC has in total been a cooling of ~-0.9°C.
The bulk of that temperature loss ~-0.4°C has been in the last 3 millennia since 1000BC.
The temperature progress of the current Holocene interglacial epoch for the last 10,000 years is interesting as a backdrop or gauge for all the recent Warmist and Alarmist predictions that have been developing over the last 40 – 50 years.
The Holocene interglacial can be looked at in two phases:
- the early Holocene, encompassing its highest “Climate Optimum”, was relatively stable at the millennial level showing only a modest cooling of about 0.007°C per millennium from about 8000BC up until about 1000BC.
- thereafter the more recent 3000 year phase 1000BC – 2000AD shows much more rapid cooling at a rate of 0.137°C per millennium, (i.e. at about twenty times the earlier rate).
This millennial analysis of the GRIP record is reinforced by the profiles of other Northern Hemisphere ice core records, on millennial scales as shown below. These other millennial profiles show even steeper declines than the GISP2 record.
Judging from the lengths of past interglacial periods, after some 10,000 – 11,000 years the Holocene epoch should now be drawing to its close.
A climate reversion in to a full, encroaching, glaciation is therefore foreseeable, if not overdue, in this century, the next century, or this millennium.
So the most recent 3 millennia have experienced accelerated cooling. A continued natural climate change towards a colder climate is now more rather than less likely.
Cooling will lead to more intense and adverse weather. There is good reason to expect this, simply because the overall energy differential between the poles and the tropics can only be greater with cooling and that in itself would lead to less stable conditions in the atmosphere.
In addition to more adverse weather, any coming cooling will also lead to very serious deprivation for mankind and the biosphere as a whole. Growing seasons will shorten and less arable land will be capable of crop production.
There is clear evidence of this form of detrimental climate change with the cooling during the Little Ice Age. In Europe that was a time of great pestilence, social upheaval and failure of civilised settlements, for example in Greenland, due to that adverse colder climate change. A further contemporary example was the demise of the Ankor Wat civilisation in Cambodia, which occurred from the drier cooler climate of the Little Ice Age.
But during the last two centuries the world has been recovering from these adverse conditions and the marginal rise in temperature the late 20th century has been wholly beneficial for mankind and the biosphere.
But all current Climate Change discussions and alarmist propaganda only concentrate on short term temperature variations since about 1850, (the recovery from the Little Ice Age). Often these are dependent on very minor, short term temperature increases. These always try to emphasise ever increasing global temperatures. They are often presented as disaster but they are only measured in virtually undetectable one hundredths of a degree Centigrade.
The predictions of Catastrophic Global Warming by alarmists should be set in the context of the temperature picture of the current Holocene interglacial. When the predictions of Global warming alarmists are seen in the overall context of the Holocene epoch the much vaunted and much feared “fatal” tipping point of +2°C can be seen to only bring Global temperatures to the level of the very congenial and productive “Roman warm period”. And that further rise of +2°C could only bring positive economic benefits to the bulk of man-kind especially in the Northern hemisphere.
Catastrophic Global Warming alarmists postulate that temperature rise will reach the “potentially horrendous” level, (in their view), of +4°C by from the inclusion of major positive feedbacks from additional water vapor in the atmosphere. Even so the +4°C temperature level would still only bring global temperatures only up to about the level of the previous Eemian maximum.
The Eemian interglacial ~120,000 years ago, was a warm and very plentiful period in the world’s history: hippopotami thrived in the Rhine delta. As on-land ice sheets receded substantially in the Eemian, the resulting sea levels were about 3 meters higher than at present. But the ice sheet disintegration process to achieve that would have taken several millennia to have been fulfilled.
However according to the Alarmists all their radical and destructive consequences of temperature increases are supposed to occur over in this century 2000 – 2100AD. And according to them this “overheating catastrophe” will be solely attributable to Man-kind’s burning of fossil fuels and emission of extra Carbon Dioxide into the atmosphere.
Excess CO2 from burning fossil fuel was certainly not the cause of the much higher Eemian peak ~120,000 years ago.
But over the past ~20 years:
- Man-made Co2 emissions have risen by ~14%
- CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere have increased by almost ~8%
and there has been no perceptible increase in Global temperature.
Global Warming Alarmists including:
- the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
- the United Nations
- many Western Governments
- Green NGOs, etc.
aggressively assert absolute catastrophe from excessive Man-made temperature rises.
It is extreme arrogance to expect that the actions of mankind could ever achieve a complete reversal of the world’s climatic cooling progress of the last 3000 years and in addition achieve a positive +4°C change over the course of the current century.
When the postulated warming in the coming century as promoted by the IPCC and other Global Warming alarmists is collated against the progress of actual Holocene temperatures, the absolute implausibility of the Man-made Global Warming hypothesis by adding comparatively marginal amounts of CO2 to the atmosphere becomes obvious.
Global warming protagonists should accept that our Holocene interglacial
- has been in a long-term decline
- that decline has accelerated over the last 3000 years and
- that any action taken by Man-kind is unlikely to make any difference whatsoever.
Were the actions by Man-kind able to avert any warming they would eventually just reinforce the catastrophic cooling that is bound to return very soon in geological time scales.